It was written by AI used to feel like a warning label. Now it barely means anything at all.

Two people can both say they used AI generated content, and they can be describing completely different things. One typed a single sentence and published whatever came back. The other spent three days researching, then asked AI to tidy the spelling.

Same words. Same label. Nothing else the same.

If you are building an online income around the trust your readers place in you, that gap matters more than most people realise. I want to walk you through why, and what I think it means for someone in your position.

When AI Generated Just Stops Telling You Anything

Picture two marketers.

The first types one line: write me an article about email marketing. AI produces it. She copies it, pastes it in, and hits publish.

The second spends three days on the same subject. She talks to two people who do it for a living. She builds her own argument. Then she asks AI to suggest better headlines and check her spelling.

Both used AI. Neither piece deserves the same label.

The mere presence of AI tells you remarkably little about how much real thinking went into the finished piece.

That is the trouble with treating AI generated content as one single category. It hides more than it explains.

The Better Question To Ask Yourself

So instead of asking whether AI was used, I think there is a better question worth asking about your own work.

What did I bring to this?

Did I research it. Did I test it. Did I speak to someone real. Did I check the finished piece before I sent it out to people who trust me.

Those are the questions that decide whether something is worth someone’s time, not whether a machine touched it somewhere along the way.

I have written more about the small choices that build trust with an audience, in other articles I have shared recently. This idea sits right alongside them.

Why This Matters More Than It Looks Like

I said in an earlier piece that ignoring AI in this industry now is close to a mistake you cannot afford. I still believe that. The pace it moves at is breathtaking, and it touches almost everything we do.

But there is a difference between using a tool well and disappearing behind it.

Your readers are people trying to make ends meet, trying to build something steady for their family. They are trying to find some peace of mind before retirement gets here.

They are reading you because, over time, you have shown them you care whether they do well.

That trust is fragile. It gets built slowly and it can be undone quickly, the moment someone senses that nobody was really home behind the words.

What I Do With AI In My Own Work

I use AI. I am not going to pretend otherwise, and I do not think anyone reading this expects me to.

I use it to think through an idea faster. I use it to tidy a paragraph that is not quite landing. I use it to check something before I send it.

What I try never to hand over is the part that matters most: the story that is mine. It is the opinion I have earned from getting things wrong for over ten years, and the plain honest account of what happened and when.

Nobody else can write that part for me. Not properly.

I think that is the real shift worth making. Not should I use AI, but what am I still bringing that only I can bring.

A Small Test Before You Publish Anything

Here is a simple check I would encourage you to run on your next piece of content, whatever it is.

Read it back and ask yourself one question. If I removed every word AI touched, would there still be something real left. A story. An opinion. A result you saw happen.

If the honest answer is no, that is worth noticing before you publish, not after.

It does not mean throw the piece away. It usually just means one more pass is needed, one where you put something of yours back into it.

The Part Worth Remembering

AI generated content is not going anywhere, and I do not think it should. It has made parts of this work faster and easier for people like me who came to it late.

But the label itself tells your reader almost nothing about whether the piece is worth their time.

What tells them that is you. Your research, your honesty, your willingness to say what happened rather than what sounds impressive.

That is the one overlooked ingredient no AI tool can supply on its own, no matter how good it gets.

Where I Still Rely On Real People Being Real

One of the tools I use for keeping in touch with my own list is eShowcase. I use it mainly for managing my email list at the moment, and I am gradually connecting it up to social media too.

What I like about it is that it still leaves the actual words up to me. It helps me organise and reach people. It does not write to them for me.

If you are building a list of your own, you probably want something that keeps you close to the people on it. You do not want it replacing you in the conversation. eShowcase is worth a proper look. You can find it through the link above.

Whatever tools you use, the part your reader values is still you showing up, week after week, being honest with them.

Keep that part, and the rest is just help.

To your success.
Richie Kenn

Calling All Frustrated Entrepreneurs –
Who Else Wants To Forget Selling 'Low Priced' One Off Digital Products Such As eBooks And…

Make Cash
Like Clockwork

Using A Passive Income System That Automatically Deposits Money Into Your Bank Account Effortlessly Every Month Instead.

Just enter your details below to discover how:

Privacy Policy: We value your privacy. You can unsubscribe from receiving future emails with 1 click at any time.